.177 and .22or .22 and .25 for small game?
Printed From: Kiwi Airgunners
Category: Technical
Forum Name: Pauly's Technical Area
Forum Description: Technical information, Modifications and DIY projects are all in here
URL: www.kiwiairgunners.co.nz/forum_posts.asp?TID=1340
Printed Date: 09 Jun 2026 at 4:58am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 10.14 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: .177 and .22or .22 and .25 for small game?
Posted By: Ashman
Subject: .177 and .22or .22 and .25 for small game?
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2026 at 2:41pm
|
As above. So I'm air gunning small game mostly, but, after a lifetime of shooting and now owning no rim, centrefire or shotguns for the first time since I was 11, it's back to air rifles I spend my spare time in the bush kayaking and fishing, often remotely and sometimes for up to 3 or 4 weeks at a time. I also only work part time and have Wednesday through Friday off each week. During that time I fish a lot, with fly, ultra light and sea fishing from land and from either of my two kayaks, though mostly from a 5.2m sit on touring/fishing platform. I do those longer trips kind of survival style, in that I take oats, lentils and rice plus herbs, spices and an emergency ration kit in case I get stranded somewhere through injury or weather related events, which has happened once or twice. The idea is that I have breakfast and carbs sorted, but I have to hustle for protein, soo that I've got a reason to get out and fish or hunt. I used to do that with centrefire, shotty or rimfire but I gave up my firearms licence when the new laws regarding those came in to effect and now it's air rifles only. I spend a fair bit of time in the McKenzie country, Central and Southland but also Marlborough and the Coast and there's plenty of small game in many of those places. In terms of small game I've just bought a .22 Gamo Swarm Magnum which I'm enjoying. I've had it 6 days and put roughly 200 rounds through it and it's starting to settle in. I've just been in touch with a member on here regarding trigger components and he has very kindly offered to send me them pro gratis, other than the postage fee, ( Thank you KiwiTR6) which is very much appreciated and given the rest of the rifle, with the after market optics I've added seems robust and capable and the grouping with the right pellets is starting to come together better, I'm now thinking of adding another calibre. If you had to choose any two of the above calibres, what would they be and why, please? More speed, less drop in the .177 but more punch in the .25? I spend a lot of time in remote places and some of those places have abundant small game. I do up to 4 weeks at a time living out of a touring/fishing kayak or with a pack on my back and I've previously used rimfire, centrefire and shotguns to procure protein, as I normally do those longer trips survival style where I carry oats, lentils, rice and beans plus herbs and spices, but I need to forage and gather protein to eat well and go to bed without my guts grizzling. I also have Wednesday through Friday off as a part time worker, though I carry a few luxuries food wise when I'm off on those weekly trips. So, the question is, will the .22 do all that or is there an advantage in .177 or .25 over the .22? If you could only own 2 calibres in air, which would they be and why?
|
Replies:
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2026 at 3:49pm
Whats small game to you? How accurate your set up is the biggest factor. Opossum, hare,turkey all viable targets for .22 My magnum at 26fpe dropped a young goat at 26m. That was around 20fpe at target. 102m on rabbit. Both one shot kills. So in that regard it was all down to shot placement. Wind is same as any gun. learn how your pellet drifts and compensate. Ive had some pretty good winds testing pellet flight, nothing has ever been to strong to need to take the whole windage up. Gusting, or swirling winds do create a problem if not read right. Thats more of an issue than a constent wind. 177 I don't like for hunting. Hole punchers. Require really accurate placement,not as lenient as .22. More wind effected but same as .22 with control. Fiddly size pellet to chamber in dark. .2w being slightly larger allows the pellet to be gripped easier but also gives a more distinct feeling in dark of of skirt end and face. Wieght would be thing that would have me wondering about .25 Also the advantage. If .22 takes down most small game, whats the advantage of .25? A heavier gun and less distance? Limited pellet supply. Two cals i would own, would .22 and then a 30cal in springer and that would only be used for large goats and id have a crack at small pig with it too. If your upgrades turn out well and the gun is accurate, you can place shots where you want them , can't see any point in going another cal or gun till youve been out there a bit with the air rifle and get some idea of what you need in an air rifle for your situation, then upgrade. What pellets are you using as a point of interest?
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2026 at 4:46pm
kruzaroad wrote:
Whats small game to you? How accurate your set up is the biggest factor. Opossum, hare,turkey all viable targets for .22 My magnum at 26fpe dropped a young goat at 26m. That was around 20fpe at target. 102m on rabbit. Both one shot kills. So in that regard it was all down to shot placement. Wind is same as any gun. learn how your pellet drifts and compensate. Ive had some pretty good winds testing pellet flight, nothing has ever been to strong to need to take the whole windage up. Gusting, or swirling winds do create a problem if not read right. Thats more of an issue than a constent wind. 177 I don't like for hunting. Hole punchers. Require really accurate placement,not as lenient as .22. More wind effected but same as .22 with control. Fiddly size pellet to chamber in dark. .2w being slightly larger allows the pellet to be gripped easier but also gives a more distinct feeling in dark of of skirt end and face. Wieght would be thing that would have me wondering about .25 Also the advantage. If .22 takes down most small game, whats the advantage of .25? A heavier gun and less distance? Limited pellet supply. Two cals i would own, would .22 and then a 30cal in springer and that would only be used for large goats and id have a crack at small pig with it too. If your upgrades turn out well and the gun is accurate, you can place shots where you want them , can't see any point in going another cal or gun till youve been out there a bit with the air rifle and get some idea of what you need in an air rifle for your situation, then upgrade. What pellets are you using as a point of interest?
|
Fair points on windage and accuracy. That's the same story for all the centre and rim fires I've owned, and there's been many of those. I'm getting more accurate and using Crown Magnums and Hornets. The grouping is getting better but I'll wait till I have 500 through it to determine which is the true preference. I've also got some Hades coming, which feature well in many of the videos I've watched. Small game is rabbits, hares, possums and some other pest species. I have access to a couple of spots where Canada Geese are a problem and I think the Hornets may be the go there, though I'll be sneaking close and looking for head shots on those big buggers anyway. For bigger game I'm going to a crossbow so goats are a no go for me with a pellet gun, irrespective of the power. Just my preference,, and I know there are folk that have done that, but they've only got to move their head half an inch and that's a very slow and painful death. It's also about making sure I don't have just the one option given how shaky things are in the world and, though I'm no prepper, I do want to be able to harvest food on an ongoing basis if it's needed so I'm also trying to build in fail safes. I've got 21 fishing rods and 18 reels plus enough tippet and fly tying material for about a decade. I may just end up buying another of what I've already got so I have a spare of everything. I'll find the pellets it likes and buy 5000 of them. I'm 66 so that should feed me till I don't need food any more.
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2026 at 5:10pm
Yeah id hold off on buying another of same model till you see how it works for you. There are better quality guns than gamo for around the same price. Make sure its what you want before second perchase. As for springs/ gas rams, seals they can all be brought separately. I have seals for noth my rifles brought online and spare.spring for the hw97. You know to keep away from the usual gun cleaners,greases as they cause dieseling? Better add a slingshot to your collection.
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2026 at 9:34pm
kruzaroad wrote:
Yeah id hold off on buying another of same model till you see how it works for you. There are better quality guns than gamo for around the same price. Make sure its what you want before second perchase. As for springs/ gas rams, seals they can all be brought separately. I have seals for noth my rifles brought online and spare.spring for the hw97. You know to keep away from the usual gun cleaners,greases as they cause dieseling? Better add a slingshot to your collection. |
Thanks for the tip on the cleaners. Hadn't read that anywhere so that's a good tip. I'll be using my .22 pull through with appropriate patches. The Gamo has no spring. Its a piston. But I'll get spares of anything rubber. And I already have 2 very powerful sling shots. Handy. Deadly at the right distance on the right sky rats. Which, in good condition, make a very fine meal for one. I take your point about better guns for the same money and they may be out there. Very few of them with a 10 shot mag that I don't need an FAL for though. And interoperability is a key, so, if I do get the same calibre, it will be the same rifle In the same way, I have doubles of my best fish catchers in both rods and reels too. Harvesting longevity being the key dynamic. Spares of everything important.
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 21 Apr 2026 at 7:24am
Important to use the right grease in the spring chamber area particularly. Outside and trigger what you like, anything that is involed with pressure being built up. Plenty on the web about it. Spring rifles have pistons. Gas ram does too. Its just replacing the spring set up with a gas strut. If your hunting with a spring powered rifle you can't leave it cocked as the actual spring will lose its "springyness". Most recommended not leaving spring cocked more than hour. Id decock after 20 to 30min and recock. Gas piston no issues like that. 10 shot mag. You can buy a spare ten shot mag, and the ten shot mag set up. I had a gamo whisper 10 shot. What is the advantage of the mag? Dont have to pull another pellet out and load it for quick follow up. Disadvantage in my view. More parts to fail. Can damage pellets feeding. A tendancy to cock to fast at first. Movement of breaking the barrel is a huge movement after you fired a shot and critters are on alert. Fortunately it can be used as single shot as well. As for the pellets, ive always ended up back with the standard rounded nose. Springers do not have the power to expand pellets in flesh. You'll find example through the site of pellets extracted. Think pete did one series of pellet testing he did. Do not be miss lead by how your powder burners expand a bullet to an air rifle. No similarities. If your gun fires one of the fancy pellets most accurate, then so be it. If not i believe you are better off with a round nose. I currently have jsb jumbo heavy 18.13gr for my diana ar8. Furtherst shot 102m on rabbit. H&N field target trophy 14.66gr. wiehrach hw97.furthest rabbit 75m i think.furthest shot 180m at tin can size metal. No power of course but dented the tin. Also likes exact 16gr and aa 16gr. 1322 either hades or ftt. Short distance bird gun. Loves hades( which is the only expanding pellet i use as the 1322 loves them till about 30m. Ftt pellets for distance. Furthest shot 60m on starling fft 14.66gr. All of the furthest shots I've taken have been standard round nose pellets. Ive tested heaps of fancy pallets none have proved out over distance. Golden rule.... Gun decides pellet not you. Welcome to the world of air guns. Everything effects your shot from over greasing,wrong grease,pellets type, seals, hold type, trigger pull ,scope torch, bi pods, even resting on hard etc affect poi. Spring/gas ram pistons slamming forward causing the piston to bounce before it reaches the full stroke. Before the pellet even leaves the barrel. Mastery of an air rifle (which im still learning ) Has been way more intense than any powder burner ive used. I actually prefer air rifle to 22lr for rabbit shooting these days. 22lr Is boring in comparison in my view.
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 21 Apr 2026 at 1:38pm
|
Kruzaroad, thank you for taking the tine for such a detailed answer. I appreciate it. Outside of the gun will get a light spray with CRC Marine Grade 6-66. I've used that on all my guns/rifles/fishing gear/outdoor metal stuff, tools and knives ever since it first came out as %-56 Marine grade. Good viscosity without stickiness. I think I'll stick with gas piston rifles. The older springers I had, Milbro, BSA and Hatsan, all needed a bit of attention spring wise. The piston system on the Swarm also seems to have less rebound, which I appreciate. I hear what you say about the sport in small game hunting with an air rifle. It has always made for more exciting stalking with the need for closer proximity. Skills and senses need to be top class. The Hades arrived earlier today. They'll get tested tonight. If they're good, I've got 500 of them. If not, someone on here will get them cheap. The Crows and the Hornets are good enough anyway, but the Hades? I'll find out later. I really only wanted to try them because I mistakenly thought they were domed, not dimpled and because they review well in many .22 Magnum videos. I bought a spare mag. Easy enough to single load, as you say, but just something else to misplace. I like the inertia feed system though. No issues so far and no misfeeds or dry fires. Looking forward to the next three days off. Rabbits!!
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 21 Apr 2026 at 5:57pm
If you do end up single shot, heres how I set my tins up. Stops damage. Stops noise, makes pellets easy to grab and they are facing the same direction. Do not fall out. I walk around with lid off in my shirt pocket. Its camping sleeping mat that ive poked a soldering iron into repeatedly. Think its around 65 pellets from memory.
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 21 Apr 2026 at 6:21pm
|
That is bloody brilliant. Rattles are for babies, not bunnies. As an aside, a mate of mine heard I was getting back in too air rifles and has offered me a Swarm .25 Magnum with the same scope as I've got on the .22 with about 500 pellets through it (basically hes run it in for me) and it's a year old Gen 3 with the inertia fed Mag for $1000.
|
Posted By: -Ec
Date Posted: 21 Apr 2026 at 6:44pm
I tend to put a a hand full of pellets in a pocket but something like this might work out better. I always ONLY have pellets in the particular pocket which makes grabbing the next round easy even in the dark. I've thought of the "quick load round holders" available on Trade me for around 10 bucks but not sure I would want to stick this on my stock(s) and not sure how well they would work out in the dark.
------------- Regards, -Ec
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 21 Apr 2026 at 6:46pm
I went from a gamo to tx200 to sig asp20 to a weihrauch hw97 and now a diama ar8. Two of those are raved about rifles on airgun circles. I prefer the diana to all of them. Cost less second hand. My favorite gun is the 1322. A thousand bucks puts you a good.position to get a second hand gun with good build and known for accuracy. Id try before buy his gun. It may not be what your after. Jave you test d your gamo over distance? You may find you want a gun that shoots distance better than your current one. There are a lot of advantages to a standard power rifle. You can always buy replacement parts for storage.
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 21 Apr 2026 at 6:50pm
|
Might work out better? Definitly works out ec.🙂
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 21 Apr 2026 at 8:53pm
What I'm really looking for is a small game harvester, not a tack driver, though they need to be accurate to harvest game anyway and the .22, which I've shot out to 40 metres thus far, is. If the .25 can do the same, that would be superb.Finesse is the same for me in rifles as it is in cars. I drive a Hilux. It's an A to B event and the drive doesn't have to be flash or particularly comfortable . The same with my rifles and guns over the years. What I do know is I don't want a wooden stock. And for hunting, repeatability in hold, trigger mech and optics always makes sense so that when you're accustomed to and effective with 1, it's innately transferrable to the other. Which is why in the last 20 years all I ever bought was T3 Tikkas, with the one exception being a Remington Tactical, which was a mistake. Had T3's in 7mm08, .223 and .204. The .25 is as new. The optics are identical and I was able to put some 33g slugs through it, but he had no pellets so I'm waiting till tomorrow to grab some of those and see what it can do grouping wise. Even with the slugs , the groups at 10 metres were...... acceptable, being that it is that I have never used slugs like that in an air rifle. Interesting experience. What I'm really looking for is longevity and, treated right, I should get that, given the all metal construction (mostly)and automotive quality plastics and polyethylenes plus fibre glass used in the stock. The scopes are aluminium and seem pretty robust, but I don't really know that yet, although I did drop the .22 off the yellow top wheelie bin I was using for sighting and garked it, yet even from that height, It still held the zero, surprisingly. It was a bit of a thump, on to concrete. Good sign, I suppose, even though the stupidity of allowing that to happen left me feeling like a bit of a dick. I've got three days off and I'm taking them both with me to a campsite I know. Betwixt fishing and firing, it'll be an interesting few days.
|
Posted By: -Ec
Date Posted: 21 Apr 2026 at 10:14pm
|
Great that you have a chance to fully test the .25 before making a decision - hopefully the weather gods will treat you well and you will be able to make the most of the time.
Check out the bottle-top challenge/test basically a beer bottle top is about the size of a rabbit's brain so if you can consistently hit one at the ranges you want to be able to hunt, both you and the gun are good to go.
I agree with you about wooden stocks for hunting - just too easy to scratch/mark. My Hassan has a beautiful Turkish Walnut stock and even though I don't use it much for hunting it already has a few marks. At just on 10 pounds it is too heavy to carry for too long, and at 30FPE it is a beast to cock and shoot. I do enjoy using it and is very accurate when I get everything right. It certainly hits hard!
I can see the benefit of having 2 guns that are very similar to hold and shoot - has to be an advantage for achieving consistency with both guns. My 4 rifles are all completely different to shoot - which I enjoy. However what I want from my guns is not relevant to what you want. So enjoy your 3 days camping and keep us updated with your trip.
------------- Regards, -Ec
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 22 Apr 2026 at 8:44am
|
EC the beer bottle top idea is a goodie. It'll have to be Ginger Beer though, probably a Bundie. Hitting one of those consistently at 40m should be a nice challenge. The weather forecast for my camp site at Lake Heron looks pretty sh*te today so I'll head down to a local river bed and put some shots through and head off camping overnight tomorrow. There's bunnies in the river bed too. There are rimfire spinner self resetting targets/pellet traps that are around bottle top size, and I may pick up one of those today in my search for appropriate pellets. I'll get dialled in shooting technique wise and post what happens. Some of the paper punchers on here will be smirking, I'm guessing, but, so far, everyone on here has been really supportive, positive and helpful, even if my choice of a Gamo over other far more premium brands might leave some scratching their heads.
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 22 Apr 2026 at 9:17am
Why would the paper punches be smirking? Truthfully you'd be better off with targets than spinners as you can monitor your misses etc as you get use to gun. Checking wind drift of pellets etc. Theres a cheap spinner target at gun city. A one inch and two inch circles . Push into ground. Page 102 of you got to be out there to see. Perfect for taking on your trip. Light compact enough to sit in backpack light and simple.
|
Posted By: -Ec
Date Posted: 22 Apr 2026 at 12:04pm
|
Spinners are great once you have your gun(s) dialled in but nothing beats paper for getting your gun dialled in. Even a large piece of cardboard with a simple cross in black marker pen works well. The big advantage with paper - as long as it is big enough, is that you can see if you are high, low ,left or right of you point of aim and adjust accordingly.
Even when you have your guns zeroed at what ever range you prefer, paper is best for working out your hold-overs and hold unders at different ranges.
Can't recall who came up with the bottle top challenge - Pauly5 I think? It's an easy way to test your accuracy is up to par
------------- Regards, -Ec
|
Posted By: vault
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2026 at 2:00am
|
if you can only have two air guns...
I'm a .177 shooter/hunter I only have two .177's but that's just because I got lucky but if I could only have two airguns I'd keep my prosport and buy a Diana 31 panther in .22 as I've had one of those and they're awesome, light, accurate (jsb14.3gr) a real outdoors bush basher food harvester with great T05 trigger, I see them at Youngs for $750 the same price as a Cometa Fusion which is a great springer also but it's not Diana level and then the Gamo's are 1k for budget airguns.
Brand is as important as Caliber.
You can buy a sh*t brand and it's a good one, but that's not common
Nowadays I look at survival, .177 and .22 pellets are everywhere. they used to be so much cheaper, I see some AA tins have doubled in price over 5 years and they will never be cheaper than now, so stock up while you can.
.25 I've never seen or tried so I dont know how common the pellets are but I bet they're not that common.
both .177 and .22 12-18ft/lb max with good shot placement will kill any small game in NZ and if the world turns to crap, both will head/neck a duck/goose rabbit/hare/possum out to 60m consistently with the right pellet and practice
I drive a hilux too, think practical if you want to survive
-------------
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2026 at 12:23pm
|
True regarding the .25 pellets. Places the GC have a very small selection however they have slugs galore, which I'm not a fan of for what i want. I've got JSB Hades, Apolo Air Boss domed and Gamo Pro magnum on the way for testing, the latter 2 from Broncos and the JSB from . I'll post up some results from those pellets. It'll be hard to beat the .22. for accuracy, but the real test for that will be Friday at 50m. I do like the magazine system however, and most air rifles don't offer that. It's added complexity, but you can also slide the mag aside and single load pellets too, so if that system fails, there is a fail safe. There's a few camp sites I go to where getting a feed with either the .22 or .25 will be a goer. They're places where quiet is good. I've used subsonic .22 in the past and distances are close. I hear what you say about brand, but I'm not sure I agree. I've had rifles and guns from many different manufacturers, and the logo is never a guarantee. Remington, Beretta and Winchester have all let me down on occasion, despite their respective reputations. And, in the case of Remington, that was before almost all their rifles were utter sh*te. Having said that, I may replace the .25 with a single shot of some kind. I've had 9 concussions and losing a magazine is not out of the realm of possibility. I'll pick up a spare later this week, just in case, and I already have a spare for the .22. Not a deal breaker, considering the single load capability, but just something to be aware of.
|
Posted By: vault
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2026 at 1:41pm
|
concussions, you mean head injury and therefore loosing stuff ?
I just stick to straight forward single shots, dont matter if break barrel, side or under lever, as long as you got the pellet it likes and use good technique.
I've always been a .177 fan although years ago a mate went to aussie left me his diana 31 in .22 well that turned out to be an awesome food harvester.
thing is .177 and .22 are in desks , draws all over the world, they like .22lr and 308 common as but .25, .30 like 6.5 or 204 not common, often hard to find.
I can go into most sport shops and buy a tin of something in a decent weight for .177 or .22 Bump into someone and they probably got some pellets somewhere in those calibers, they're like diesel, they will never run out (all trains, trucks, ships, military vehicles all on diesel)
for accuracy at long range i stick to proven results, 10.34gr to 10.65 in .177 or 14.3 to 15.8gr in .22 most brands have something in that range.
Remington isnt a good brand in firearms, that's hype, better of with a Bergara
Thing with airguns is QC is often sh*t in airguns unless you paying top $, I've had big dollar springers with inherent dramas but I have to say both these AA springers have been awesome.
I recently put a new spring in my prosport, never done that before, its twangy as but still awesome as. I might need to send that away, get a guide or something.
Good brands can often be bought at half price of a brand new one if you wait, watch.
I saw 3 tx200's on trademe a week ago, in 3 days they were all gone from $950 to $1500 little while back I seen Youngs had none, now the price is 2k, no mention of prosports anymore and I think they are more comfortable to shoot of me anyway but I will keep pushing forward with the tx.
End of the day .177 and .22 has killed everything in the small game world right back to the beginning when it was all iron sights. the animals havent changed, not any tougher but marketing creates perception.
They say beware the man who only has one gun, he probably knows how to use it...
I know a few of them in the real world.
Any caliber will do the job if you do your part but you dont want to buy a 6.5 creed NO more in airguns when .177 and .22 are proven for decades upon decades
I'm just raving on lol
-------------
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2026 at 4:03pm
|
By the time I've finished finding a pellet the .25 really likes, I'll have 10 tins of .22 and the same of .25, only one of which will be genuinely usable in either calibre at anything over 20m, and that's OK. They're cheap, and so am I. The Gamo Hunter in .22 is superb. The JSB Exact diabolo in .25 is the best of 4 I've tried so far and generally accurate, but if I want to match the .22 accuracy, I need to try more which is why the ones I've ordered but couldn't find locally are on their way. Yep, after 9 concussions, my memory is ............questionable, if I can remember the question. No electrical activity at all in 20% of my right frontal lobe. Thankfully my phone handles all the sh*t I need to remember, if I think to put it in there. Technology is a wonderful thing, sometimes.
|
Posted By: vault
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2026 at 5:02pm
|
nothing wrong with tins of pellets that dont work the best for your gear as there will always be someone who needs to try a pellet and one of yours might be what they need to try for their own equipment.
I been struggling to hold good groups with my tx using quality pellets that my prosport loves so after days of trying everything I decided the scope might be fked, so I swapped them, put my hawke 8-32 on the tx, dialed it in and bingo, its an awesome shooter, holding tight groups as good as my prosport to the 40m that I've shot to so far today, I try the 60m and 80m range tomorrow if wind allows.
Anyway I thought well I'll shoot the Prosport with this 10 fixed optic just to be sure its the problem, not fractionally canted or something stupid and that scope just goes so well on the prosport i never would have guessed.
The prosport does have a longer pistol grip and wide flat forestock compared to the tx round shape, it also has a slightly higher check piece and it turned the Prosport into an entirely different animal, fast to get on target, light and it held zero.
I'm going to play with it more later or tomorrow.
I love airguns even when they drive me nuts.
Head injuries, dont let it get you down or define you, I've suffered them also from various serious accidents like the bends lol my memory is also crap and yep Id be fkd without my phone to remember everything or my kids or missus.
Aslong as your out there doing it, pulling the trigger or wanting to your living and enjoying life and that's what matters bro.
If I did ever go .25 it would be this the hueben gk1
https://www.hubenairguns.shop/collections/airguns
I used to have an Edgun Veles, very similar but was in .177 I should never have sold that, I'd sell a politicians kidneys to get it back
-------------
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2026 at 5:20pm
|
Mate I'm 66 and i don't ley anything get me down I've been technically dead twice and 3 near drownings that left me coughing up water and blood so given I'm still above ground I'm happy and grateful. Thanks for that link. I'll have a shufty.
|
Posted By: vault
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2026 at 6:03pm
|
where do you hunt small game around chch. I parked up in the redzone one arvo as I was passing through and oh my the canadian geese were within 50m of me, man do they taste great roasted
I'd be into them soon as it all turns to sh*te
-------------
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2026 at 11:07pm
|
Looked at them this morning on my run to work along the Avon, and, yep, hung and tenderised for a couple of days at this time of year and a young bird is a lovely eater. Plenty of this years goslings to snaffle up, if it came to it. Around Chch there's very few areas, but I spend a lot of time fishing, kayaking and tramping around Canterbury, the Alps and the McKenzie district, plus Central to,o, and, on occasion, Nelson Marlborough plus the Catlins at the other end and there's always a tasty little critter or two around one corner or the next. Young pea fowl are good eating in spring too.
|
Posted By: Mintie
Date Posted: 30 Apr 2026 at 1:47pm
|
I've always loved .25 cal. But its a whole different argument for me as I mainly use PCP's, and .25 is where the sweet spot is for high power but low air consumption in a PCP. I can tell you that it sure hits hard at 65fpe and long range hunting is a breeze with the better BC.
For me .22 absolutely has a use case, and I have a number of PCP's in .22 I use regularly, but .177 has never really tickled my fancy. I found with .177 the shot placement was super critical and I was getting too many shots that passed through rather than creating a decent wound channel, it just didn't seem to dump its energy as well as .22 and they are not designed to fragment like 17hmr or 204 etc.
For your survival type situations check out the Crosman 1322 like Kruza said, they are very versatile being able to collapse them down into a backpack easily and with a few small mods you can up the power quite a bit and get good consistent accuracy out of them. In terms of failure points they seem to just go on forever without issues, the only maintenance needed is a little oil on the seals every so often. You can add a multi shot breech with a magazine but that feels a bit pointless when its a multi pump for each shot type of rifle. The 2250 on the other hand is a real fun little co2 version when you add the multi shot breech, but the need to keep the co2 bottles on hand takes away from the "survival minimalist" mindset.
Oh and +1 on the Hilux, Love them. My son has a 1991 LN100 2.8D which is just fantastic.
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 01 May 2026 at 8:09pm
Mintie wrote:
I've always loved .25 cal. But its a whole different argument for me as I mainly use PCP's, and .25 is where the sweet spot is for high power but low air consumption in a PCP. I can tell you that it sure hits hard at 65fpe and long range hunting is a breeze with the better BC.
For me .22 absolutely has a use case, and I have a number of PCP's in .22 I use regularly, but .177 has never really tickled my fancy. I found with .177 the shot placement was super critical and I was getting too many shots that passed through rather than creating a decent wound channel, it just didn't seem to dump its energy as well as .22 and they are not designed to fragment like 17hmr or 204 etc.
For your survival type situations check out the Crosman 1322 like Kruza said, they are very versatile being able to collapse them down into a backpack easily and with a few small mods you can up the power quite a bit and get good consistent accuracy out of them. In terms of failure points they seem to just go on forever without issues, the only maintenance needed is a little oil on the seals every so often. You can add a multi shot breech with a magazine but that feels a bit pointless when its a multi pump for each shot type of rifle. The 2250 on the other hand is a real fun little co2 version when you add the multi shot breech, but the need to keep the co2 bottles on hand takes away from the "survival minimalist" mindset.
Oh and +1 on the Hilux, Love them. My son has a 1991 LN100 2.8D which is just fantastic. |
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 01 May 2026 at 8:19pm
Ashman wrote:
Mintie wrote:
I've always loved .25 cal. But its a whole different argument for me as I mainly use PCP's, and .25 is where the sweet spot is for high power but low air consumption in a PCP. I can tell you that it sure hits hard at 65fpe and long range hunting is a breeze with the better BC.
For me .22 absolutely has a use case, and I have a number of PCP's in .22 I use regularly, but .177 has never really tickled my fancy. I found with .177 the shot placement was super critical and I was getting too many shots that passed through rather than creating a decent wound channel, it just didn't seem to dump its energy as well as .22 and they are not designed to fragment like 17hmr or 204 etc.
For your survival type situations check out the Crosman 1322 like Kruza said, they are very versatile being able to collapse them down into a backpack easily and with a few small mods you can up the power quite a bit and get good consistent accuracy out of them. In terms of failure points they seem to just go on forever without issues, the only maintenance needed is a little oil on the seals every so often. You can add a multi shot breech with a magazine but that feels a bit pointless when its a multi pump for each shot type of rifle. The 2250 on the other hand is a real fun little co2 version when you add the multi shot breech, but the need to keep the co2 bottles on hand takes away from the "survival minimalist" mindset.
Oh and +1 on the Hilux, Love them. My son has a 1991 LN100 2.8D which is just fantastic. |
|
Crosman 1322comes up as a pistol? I've used a few. Sidearm in the infantry was a 1911 Hi Power in 9mm parabellum, but I wouldn't want one for survival. Just back from 3 days away and had another play today with the .25. Best group of 8 was .481 at 20m, but that was with a right to left variable breeze. At 30m, I didn't bother with a measure. The breeze had picked up. I'll have to sort out MPBR as they were 2cm at that point. Is that usual for a magnum .25? Pellets are 25.39 JSB Diabolo Exact Match, so quite light for .25. Still haven't received the other 3 lots of pellets I ordered, but with a .481 group at 20m in a breeze and with close to 300 pellets through the rifle since new, I'm picking that's workable anyhow. I'll get back inside tomorrow and 30m group them again now the tube is leaded in. See how that goes.
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 02 May 2026 at 10:11am
That is correct. The crossman 1322 is a pistol. It is however probly one of the most easily and accessable guns for modification. Parts being readily available for ehat ever mods you want. Both of mine are stocked and one has am longer barrel added. Steel breach added to both. Of all my guns 1322 has taken the most critters, which include rabbit at 8 and possum at a foot. Use it for finishing cats caught in live traps. It will pop a pigeon out of a tree. Mine are a basic set up. Haven't even increased the air volume or port size yet. Don't underestimate the 1322. Oh accurate as over its.usable distance. Try looking up custom crossman 1322 pictures on the web.
|
Posted By: vault
Date Posted: 02 May 2026 at 2:13pm
I been looking at either a 1377 or 1322 or both, I've heard good things about both
-------------
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 02 May 2026 at 2:55pm
kruzaroad wrote:
That is correct. The crossman 1322 is a pistol. It is however probly one of the most easily and accessable guns for modification. Parts being readily available for ehat ever mods you want. Both of mine are stocked and one has am longer barrel added. Steel breach added to both. Of all my guns 1322 has taken the most critters, which include rabbit at 8 and possum at a foot. Use it for finishing cats caught in live traps. It will pop a pigeon out of a tree. Mine are a basic set up. Haven't even increased the air volume or port size yet. Don't underestimate the 1322. Oh accurate as over its.usable distance. Try looking up custom crossman 1322 pictures on the web. |
OK got ya! Would be a handy EDC format for spontaneous kai gathering. But, for all the mods, why not just a carbine in the same cal? I put over 2000 rounds through a 1911 and still wouldn't have wanted a person sized target at above 30m. And that was 9mm. Where can I buy an Air Arms under lever .22? Or Wehirauch HW50? Or, given the expertise on here, what would be the other options I can get in a quality .22?
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 02 May 2026 at 2:59pm
|
Do either Air Arms Weirhauch come in plastic?
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 02 May 2026 at 3:24pm
Yes wiehrach do synthetic stocks on some models. I have hw97 blackline which is the synthetic stock version of hw97. My diana which has impressed me way more than the weihrauch also is synthetic. I'll probly be selling that hw with scope and spare spring and seals couple of tins of ftt 14.66gr which it loves after this scope arrives next week and i get to make sure the diana doesn't just kill it.
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 02 May 2026 at 4:29pm
kruzaroad wrote:
Yes wiehrach do synthetic stocks on some models. I have hw97 blackline which is the synthetic stock version of hw97. My diana which has impressed me way more than the weihrauch also is synthetic. I'll probly be selling that hw with scope and spare spring and seals couple of tins of ftt 14.66gr which it loves after this scope arrives next week and i get to make sure the diana doesn't just kill it. |
What's the Diana you have comiing?
|
Posted By: -Ec
Date Posted: 02 May 2026 at 5:10pm
|
Kruza,
Before you sell the HW97 you need to see if the Diana can better the 172m shot you did with the Wiehrach! Still amazed that you pulled that off - more than once.....
------------- Regards, -Ec
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 02 May 2026 at 5:26pm
183m was the furthest hit with that rifle Nah takes to much to set up again. Diana has proved it can do a hundred and thats as far as i need to shoot. However if someone wants to beat that distance springer or pcp im keen to kick it off again. But fir now I'm cutting back to 1 rifle and two 1322. May even strip one of valves out at some stage and dremil it a bit. Time will tell.
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 02 May 2026 at 5:32pm
I have the diana the scope is coming. Its an ar8, magnium springer. I went to by a telly 4.5 to restore and the guy showed me that and i brought it about 550 i think. Brand new still had box. Moderator added i think as i havent found any with mods on the stock model and the barrel is pretty short without it. Not crowned either. Still shoots fine but no open sights due the alterations, which sux.
|
Posted By: RangerPete
Date Posted: 06 May 2026 at 9:28am
Hi Ashman, If you are still weighing up the merits of .177 vs .22 vs .25, I posted a pretty in depth comparison of penetrations and performance of all 3 calibers on my you tube channel a while ago. I compared all 3 calibers at 16FPE. If you are interested my channel is called #precisionpellet and the video was called comparing apples to apples or something like that… 😂
------------- Walk quietly, but carry a big stick.
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 06 May 2026 at 10:23am
RangerPete wrote:
Hi Ashman, If you are still weighing up the merits of .177 vs .22 vs .25, I posted a pretty in depth comparison of penetrations and performance of all 3 calibers on my you tube channel a while ago. I compared all 3 calibers at 16FPE. If you are interested my channel is called #precisionpellet and the video was called comparing apples to apples or something like that… 😂
|
Wicked, thanks,I'll have a gaze!
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 06 May 2026 at 12:36pm
Have a question pete. Won't the different size cal have different weights? Which means that theres different fpe at target for each cal. So comparing apples to apples its a test of cal at same muzzle energy. However if you want actual penitration data comparing slug preformance in whatever medium, shouldn't it be equal fpe at target? Just a thought.
|
Posted By: Mintie
Date Posted: 07 May 2026 at 4:12pm
RangerPete wrote:
Hi Ashman, If you are still weighing up the merits of .177 vs .22 vs .25, I posted a pretty in depth comparison of penetrations and performance of all 3 calibers on my you tube channel a while ago. I compared all 3 calibers at 16FPE. If you are interested my channel is called #precisionpellet and the video was called comparing apples to apples or something like that… 😂
|
Feels like that sort of comparison is ignoring the merits of the different cals to be honest, it's like comparing how fast a Ferrari is vs a Miata but driving them both at the speed limit for the test.
|
Posted By: Ashman
Date Posted: 07 May 2026 at 10:21pm
Mintie wrote:
RangerPete wrote:
Hi Ashman, If you are still weighing up the merits of .177 vs .22 vs .25, I posted a pretty in depth comparison of penetrations and performance of all 3 calibers on my you tube channel a while ago. I compared all 3 calibers at 16FPE. If you are interested my channel is called #precisionpellet and the video was called comparing apples to apples or something like that… 😂
|
Feels like that sort of comparison is ignoring the merits of the different cals to be honest, it's like comparing how fast a Ferrari is vs a Miata but driving them both at the speed limit for the test.
|
That's sensible. Compare them both at their best, not one at their best and the other at its worst.
|
Posted By: RangerPete
Date Posted: 09 May 2026 at 10:13pm
That would depend on what you think “the best”’ velocity is for each caliber….
Kruza, yes of course they will have different weight pellets, so I set up each rifle to be producing around 16FPE at the muzzel and then compared terminal ballistics of all 3 at different distances. .177 with the lightest pellets will loose speed and FPE fastest the further it goes down range, .25 will retain the most speed and FPE at the same distances. I think if I remember correctly I compaired them at realistic hunting distances, around 30ish, 40ish and 50ish yards.
------------- Walk quietly, but carry a big stick.
|
Posted By: RangerPete
Date Posted: 09 May 2026 at 10:15pm
https://youtu.be/1crIHXetjIk?si=7FWhn2Oao9RA1xhC
------------- Walk quietly, but carry a big stick.
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 09 May 2026 at 11:47pm
That doesn't measure pellet preformance on the target. Which is what you alluding to. To compare how different pellet cal preform in flesh or whatever medium the pellets hitting target at same velocity allows the pellet to deform create cavity and penitration depth on an equal footing, Your doing fps and fpe drop comparison at target. Then checking the damage. Not an apples to apples pellet test on the pellets effect due to its cal. Its still a valid test of energy drop, and difference of cal weight and energy retained. Thats great flight info, put the hold over/under into that as well and you get the pellet arc which is a major difference in the cals. You were making great videos last time i checked, but that was a while ago and mostly you shooting rabbits. Time for revisit and see what else you've covered.
|
Posted By: JasonEdward
Date Posted: 12 May 2026 at 1:30pm
Hmmm..... I guess my point of view is if I'm choosing a caliber I will be looking at the same powered rifle shooting the different pellets so for me Pete's comparison is more useful. Identical muzzle velocity comparisons mean very different power outputs and totally different rifle, at least in set up. So two different apples and two different pellets for me is not so useful.
But then I have different caliber barrels for two of my air rifles so I may be highly biased toward Pete's methods.
|
Posted By: kruzaroad
Date Posted: 12 May 2026 at 1:44pm
The same power plant will not produce equal fpe or fps at muzzle with different cal in a springer. Thats physics. But your right Pete's test will be a lot closer than just two different random rifles. You can download a ballistics app and play with wieght and size.
|
|