Kiwi Airgunners Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical > Reviews
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Umarex .22 calibre 850 M2
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Umarex .22 calibre 850 M2

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
mercs View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 Apr 2020
Location: Stratford
Status: Offline
Posts: 296
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mercs Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Feb 2025 at 10:12am
Summer conditions test of M2 CO2 usage with Walther 12 gramme cartridge adaptor ($200)
60 shots without any discernible change in performance.
I was surprised at the high shot count so immediately repeated the test with same result.
Warm afternoon at 23 degrees Celcius.

These were my preferred genuine Crosman capsules at $2.50 each. 
Prices range from $2 - $3 and bulk purchase can reduce costs.
 
Walther adapter with US 1 cent coin between the capsules ensures an effective pierce of both ends.


Adaptor is valved so can be pressurised and then safely inserted or removed from rifle.




Edited by mercs - 09 Feb 2025 at 10:43am
Back to Top
mercs View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 Apr 2020
Location: Stratford
Status: Offline
Posts: 296
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mercs Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Feb 2025 at 10:30am
Accuracy follow up. 

I continued to have "fliers" despite numerous changes to the rifle, pellets and technique.

Not using the bipod mounted on fore-stock picatinny rail was last piece of puzzle to prevent “fliers”.
Any forward pressure from bipod transfers to the barrel.
I have checked the barrel fit and mechanism and there is nothing loose so I believe the barrel deflects.

I do not notice this with my almost identical Hammerli .177 which has a bipod retro fitted.
There will be a difference in barrel cross section and subsequent strength.
Hammerli Barrel OD 15.1mm ID 4.5mm
Umarex Barrel OD 14.9mm ID 5.5mm

The OD difference was unexpected.
Invites a future comparison strength test with some weights and dial gauges.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.14
Copyright ©2001-2012 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.122 seconds.