![]() |
Lobbying for change |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
kruzaroad
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2022 Location: Hastings 4 now Status: Offline Posts: 2619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Lobbying for changePosted: 17 Jul 2024 at 9:48am |
|
Yeah that law is 55 years old. Things have changed a lot in that time. Espially the power output of springer units. Hell it's 1 year younger than I am, and the air rifles I played with growing up don't even compare for power. Hmmm except a double spring Chinese gun that was made for training troops in kick back. Actual gun was made shoody but it certainly had power. |
|
![]() |
|
nunga
Admin
Joined: 09 Mar 2013 Location: Pukekohe Status: Offline Posts: 1081 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 Jul 2024 at 9:25am |
|
I dont buy into the 10pfe either. heck, my TX200 which is made in the UK is 18FFE off the shelf. i had to get a low power kit for it. The .30 Hatsan puts out 30 FPE off the shelf.
|
|
|
2nd place HP springer - WFTF World Championships 2014
|
|
![]() |
|
RangerPete
Senior Member
Joined: 19 Apr 2023 Location: Cambridge. Status: Offline Posts: 1023 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jul 2024 at 1:28pm |
|
Kruza, I dont buy that story about 12FPE limit being imposed on UK residents to limit imports because local made ones could only produce 10FPE... Nonsence. (I know its not your theory, just saying I dont buy it).
Some of the best air rifle manufacturers in the world are based in the UK and have been making air rifles for decades. BSA made millions of fire arms that fought through (and won) both world wars, you dont think they could produce an air rifle stronger then 10FPE??? A 100% more likely origin of the 12FPE law was to limit air rifle power for "the safety of the general population" but to still allow the ethical hunting of small game. And having had extensive use of 12FPE air rifles for many many years there is no argument that they are perfectly sufficient for the hunting of small game. Edited by RangerPete - 13 Jul 2024 at 1:31pm |
|
|
Walk quietly, but carry a big stick.
|
|
![]() |
|
RangerPete
Senior Member
Joined: 19 Apr 2023 Location: Cambridge. Status: Offline Posts: 1023 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jul 2024 at 1:12pm |
|
Interesting to note the legislation as it stands does not apply to multi pump guns (example my Sharp Innova) which does not require a FAL but can get up to 18-20 fpe. [/QUOTE] Anyone know what the big Hatsan .30cal break barrel can produce? I dont know my self, but I'm sure it must be around 30FPE... no licence required for that, or for any other springer, they all licence free. So anyone who is too lazy to apply for a firearms licence and pass a simple MULTIPLE CHOICE test, really cant complain and say they cant do pest control because of a lack of equipment. |
|
|
Walk quietly, but carry a big stick.
|
|
![]() |
|
kruzaroad
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2022 Location: Hastings 4 now Status: Offline Posts: 2619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jul 2024 at 7:15am |
|
Oh it's believed the 12fpe law came, Englands air guns weren't able to compete with the foreign companies, espially in power so put a 12fpe limit on, affecting how many imports could get to market.
At that stage English air rifles were about 10fpe, so 12 gave them a bit of play room. There is another theory that it was picked on ability for small game verses ability to harm people aswell |
|
![]() |
|
kruzaroad
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2022 Location: Hastings 4 now Status: Offline Posts: 2619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jul 2024 at 7:06am |
|
This site recons 58fpe is fatal less if hit in vital.
Shows few videos of differnt objects being shot with air rifle. Turns out at 12fpe England is by no measure the lowest fpe unlicenced. https://airguntactical.com/pages/airguns-fpe-lethality-chart#:~:text=According%20to%20%E2%80%9CHomicide%20Using%20an,pellets%20strike%20in%20key%20positions. Edited by kruzaroad - 13 Jul 2024 at 7:06am |
|
![]() |
|
Deano
Member
Joined: 11 Jan 2024 Location: Tasman Status: Offline Posts: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jul 2024 at 2:57am |
|
My 0.02c ... I'm not sure where 12 ft/lb comes from (apart from the UK), we wouldn't need to follow that - especially as we have a more legitimate reason for needing higher fpe for pest control.
Personally I would allow PCP's up to say 30 ft/lb, and leave the legislation alone for spring operated guns as they tend to be self-limiting for mechanical reasons (I don't think you're gonna get a 50 fpe springer). Interesting to note the legislation as it stands does not apply to multi pump guns (example my Sharp Innova) which does not require a FAL but can get up to 18-20 fpe.
|
|
![]() |
|
Pauly5
Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Mar 2013 Location: Titahi Bay Status: Offline Posts: 1663 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jul 2024 at 12:17pm |
|
A thought. If airguns are restricted by power, how does that effect archery and slingshots.
Am i right in saying that there is no restriction on them? Would lobbying for change cause these to be looked at too? In my industry, changes have bought unwanted attention from intellectuals sitting behind screens to hail down restrictive registration changes on products we use without consulting the industry itself. |
|
![]() |
|
kruzaroad
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2022 Location: Hastings 4 now Status: Offline Posts: 2619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jul 2024 at 6:29am |
|
Yeah I just go by 5fpe at target min, with head shot. Bump that up for a possum. Bump that up for body shot at distance.
Check out the fpe over distance graph, in gun chair and move to suit or don't shoot. Saves a lot math. |
|
![]() |
|
Reissue
Member
Joined: 07 Jul 2024 Location: Hawkes Bay Status: Offline Posts: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jul 2024 at 1:27am |
|
Good post here is my basic understanding: Energy vs. Momentum and Sectional Density: Energy (ft-lbs or Joules): Measures the capacity to do work. In ballistics, it gives an idea of potential damage, but it does not directly translate to penetration or lethality. Momentum (kg·m/s): Product of mass and velocity. Higher momentum means the projectile can maintain its velocity longer when encountering resistance, aiding penetration. Sectional Density: Ratio of mass to cross-sectional area. Higher sectional density means a projectile can penetrate deeper as it concentrates more force on a smaller area. Penetration Dynamics: High Energy, Low Mass (e.g., .22 pellet): These projectiles travel fast but may fragment or lose energy quickly upon impact, reducing penetration. Lower Energy, High Mass (e.g., arrow): These projectiles move slower but maintain momentum better, allowing deeper penetration due to their higher sectional density and sustained force application. |
|
![]() |
|
KiwiTR6
Senior Member
Joined: 04 Nov 2022 Location: Stratford Status: Offline Posts: 382 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Jul 2024 at 3:20pm |
|
My 2 cents worth... My view is that the current system is, in general terms, fit for purpose - although I don't agree with the compulsory registration of individual guns due to potential for data breaches (probably more of an issue for the powder burner owners than air gunners) and would also like to see administration of the regulations undertaken by an independent authority. I don't see that the introduction of a 12ftlb limit for unlicensed gun owners would achieve anything of real value but would instead give rise to confusion, potential gun tampering and inconvenience to owners by way of compliance checks to ensure that the 12ftlb limit isn't exceeded. I believe that restricting PCP rifle ownership to licensed gun owners was a sensible move as they are potentially every bit as lethal as a normal firearm. Our system, with intensive background checks and firearms training processes, goes a long way to ensuring that licensed owners are sensible and trustworthy individuals. Springers and CO2 guns should be left as they are currently. The mechanical limitations of their designs in terms of outright power negates the need to impose an arbitrary limit and the introduction of even more more legislation and regulations to ensure compliance. The real problem for the airgun industry is the up-front cost. Even the cheap PCPs are expensive in relative terms, as are the good quality springers. I don't see that this is likely to change and so making sub-12ftlb PCPs available to the general public isn't going to fix that problem. Edited by KiwiTR6 - 09 Jul 2024 at 3:22pm |
|
|
Daystate Red Wolf .22
FX Dreamline .22 Diana Outlaw .22 AA S410 .22 HW98 .177 HW30 .177 Diana 340 E-Tec .177 FWB Sport 124 .177 Gamo 900 .22 Baikal IJ-22 .177 Crosman 2240 Custom .22 Brocock GP .22 |
|
![]() |
|
BC_Clark
Member
Joined: 16 Feb 2024 Location: Auckland Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Jul 2024 at 1:08pm |
|
A big problem with imposing energy limit is that energy is not a reliable measure of how deadly an airgun is. .177 springers have killed people but 12 ft-lb in 9 mm may not even penetrate. Deadliness comes about from penetrating deep enough to reach vital areas. Penetration is proportional to the product of momentum and sectional density. Not energy. High velocity with low mass is an expensive way to create momentum, that's why 12 ft-lbs arrow will out-penetrate a 12 ft-lbs .22 pellet, despite similar diameter. We do not see PCP pistol crime. We see thugs using hammers, or else illegal firearms. PCP pistols are living proof that there is no requirement to restrict PCP power limits. |
|
![]() |
|
Reissue
Member
Joined: 07 Jul 2024 Location: Hawkes Bay Status: Offline Posts: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Jul 2024 at 11:31am |
Correct this is what I was more thinking about but perhaps raised about a 12fpe limit owing to larger pests being here perhaps more like 25-35fpe. One would hope a restriction on springers would not be put in place at the same time.
|
|
![]() |
|
J-S
Senior Member
Joined: 20 Oct 2014 Location: Auckland Status: Offline Posts: 484 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Jul 2024 at 7:31am |
|
So, I get that your suggesting opening up sub12FPE PCPs to those of legal age to own spring air rifles. But I think the only thing that would do would implement a blanket 12fpe airgun law for all air rifles - spring & pcp like UK. The UK is a very different market, this will just lead to cats walking around with missing eyes, people finding possums bleeding to death because people dont understand the power required for efficient kill I dont really want that, so for that reason i'm out.. |
|
|
J S Airguns
Air Arms TX200('s) Theoben Sirocco HW77 FWB 300s Webley Patriot One or two others... Current projects: Too many.. |
|
![]() |
|
kruzaroad
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2022 Location: Hastings 4 now Status: Offline Posts: 2619 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Jul 2024 at 2:29am |
|
Lmao isn't it usually ppl go to pcp cause they don't like springers? Not visa versa.
I don't think he's sujesting that all pcps are limited to 12fpe, but like England you don't need a fal for anything under 12fpe. Fal for anything over 12fpe. So it won't affect your guns if you have mag loading multiple shot, high power pcp. I think the under 12 fpe without a fal in pcp would open up the sport of pcp shooting to many and pest control. They are the upgrade from springers for hunting for many. People have the right to control pests. Poms have proved 12fpe is enough for rabbits out to 100m. Still wouldn't like my single shot, that have to recock every shot springer to lose it's extra few fpe over 12fpe, but if it opens up the amount of pest critters shot due people being able to access easy to shoot accurate low powered guns, I'm for it. Killing things isn't a sport. We have a problem with pest critters. Any shooter taking pest numbers down is better than nothing. Target shooting is a sport. Under 12 fpe will open that sport up. Bring in new blood and give people a chance to explore the sport before deciding if they want to spend all that money on a fal before being able to purchase a pcp to participate. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |